Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:24
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
When the sun dies, could life survive on the Jupiter ocean moon Europa? - Space
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Unclear if rock bottom, but Braves hit it anyway in 11-10 stunner loss - Battery Power
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do people always talk about Ohio as it's a dangerous city?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Isaacman interested in privately funded science missions - SpaceNews
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Will Canada and Mexico become stronger partners in the Trump era?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Poor appetite? What that can mean and how to get hungry again - The Washington Post
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Kanye West Shows Up At Sean 'Diddy' Combs’ Trial—And Quickly Leaves - Forbes
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.